Charity Never Faileth But Sometimes Legislators Do

March 4, 2015 is a night I’ll always remember as one of the worst of my life. It started well: a large crowd of Utahns gathered together to support bringing healthcare access to tens of thousands of their fellow human beings.

But despite moving testimony, sound logic, and overwhelming evidence, the members of the Utah House of Representatives Business and Labor Committee rejected Senator Brian Shiozawa’s SB 164, a variation on Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s Healthy Utah alternative for Medicaid expansion.

For those who don’t understand what Medicaid expansion is (I’ve found a distressingly high number of people don’t), it’s a way of covering a group of people left in a gap created by the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision regarding the Affordable Care Act. People who don’t qualify for traditional Medicaid, but also don’t make enough to qualify for premium assistance under the Affordable Care Act fall into a hole in which they can't get affordable coverage. When Utah’s legislature was unwilling to accept taking back billions of dollars of its own tax money to help its citizens because of the demon of “Obamacare,” a conservative-friendly compromise known as “Healthy Utah” was born. But Healthy Utah wasn’t enough for the hard core conservatives of the committee last night.


Supporters of Healthy Utah at the meeting varied from medical professionals to business leaders to religious leaders to people in the coverage gap to concerned citizens. Opponents ranged from right-wing think tanks to ultra right-wing think tanks to a dermatologist with a chip on his shoulder. The testimony from supporters was heartbreaking, and after one finished I had to chase him down the hall, give him a hug, and tearfully tell him he’s my hero. But none of this was able to persuade a committee which seemed to have already made up its mind, which substituted infinite repetition of the word “sustainable” for thoughtful discourse. Instead, the committee voted for the alternate “Utah Cares” plan developed by House Majority Leader Jim Dunnigan, a plan which pays more per patient to cover fewer people, and puts 40% of them in Utah’s Primary Care Network, or PCN. PCN covers only basic primary care, with no specialty care, no urgent care, no mental or behavioral health care, no hospital care, and only limited prescription coverage. Rep. Dunnigan kept acknowledging that “It’s not a Cadillac plan”, but as I said in my testimony, “It’s not even a Pinto plan.” It does nothing for people like my friend Stacy Stanford, who needs MRIs and other tests to diagnose a neurological condition caused by a car accident. It does nothing for the amazing people I’ve met through Utah Support Advocates For Recovery Awareness, who are bravely fighting substance use issues. In a year and a half of working with people in the gap to tell their stories in my documentary Entitled to Life, I’ve met people with dozens of different serious issues, and not one of them would be helped by PCN. Not even a little bit.

The fight isn’t over. The Senate is very unlikely to approve “Utah Cares” even if it can get past the full House, so a compromise will likely be in the works. I’m very doubtful it will come during this legislative session. This means more people are left to wait and suffer while we find a way to make legislators value the lives of God’s children more than they value their resentment toward President Obama. And I pray that most of those afflicted will still be here when the compromise finally comes.

(Image source:

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Alex Getts
    commented 2015-03-09 16:29:09 -0700
    The sad thing is that the ACA, in so many ways, IS a Republican plan. The mandate was the GOP alternative to the Clinton universal health care plan, and the ACA is modeled on Romneycare. The “problem” literally is that it was passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by a Democratic president. None of this would be an issue with these people if a Republican passed the bill.
  • Mary Ellen
    commented 2015-03-05 18:06:24 -0800
    I think it’s very hypocritical to call the plan “Utah Cares”. It frustrates me to no end to see people in need of medical care kicked to the curb because of hate for our President and acting on that hate, is more important then taking care of the sick and needy. It really bothers me that the people in Utah find it unnecessary to inform themselves about medicaid expansion and what it really is, but support the conservative legislators, blindly, because they too, don’t want to hear about anything that comes from President Obama, or anything liberal. They might be missing out on something they or a family member may need now or in the future but the ACA didn’t come from a Republican president so why bother to know about it, support it or use it if it isn’t a conservative plan? But certainly nothing new for this state. Just getting worse by the minute.
  • Paul Gibbs
    published this page in Blog 2015-03-05 07:13:37 -0800

Subscribe Share


get updates